Re Green Springfield Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455350756
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Springfield, MA, USA
- Phone
- 4134092456
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $122,025
- Expenses
- $124,711
- Assets
- $20,807
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Berg-William (Vice President)
- Bloniarz-David (President)
People named in this filing
- Berg-William (Vice President)
- Bloniarz-David (President)
- Contant-Elizabeth (Clerk)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Through our tree advocacy efforts, ReGreen Springfield has collaborated with neighborhood residents, community organizations, educational partners and government agencies to promote the reforestation of Springfield, MA, improve growing conditions for trees, and engage new allies in tree care and monitoring, education and citizen science. We realize that the strength of our city is found in the neighborhoods. With this as the foundation for our work, we have embarked on an effort to 'regreen' the city... one tree at at time. Our work is primarily carried out in low-income neighborhood and engages residents who are the most at risk for the negative impacts of global climate change at the local level.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the 2025 Tax Year, ReGreen Springfield was able to serve over 275 Springfield residents through a variety of programming, including community engagement, public outreach, education and youth related field expeditions and learning programs. Additionally, we assisted with the Springfield Greening the Gateway Cities Program through technical services, community learning programs and neighborhood outreach. Finally, we worked with the City of Springfield Parks and Recreation Department to deliver after-school and summer outdoor educational programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 10
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 9.8%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 10
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -32.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 9.8% of revenue deployed · 9.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.