Re-establish Richmond Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352383456
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8047236414
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $764,343
- Expenses
- $750,193
- Assets
- $626,164
- Liabilities
- $4,510
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KATE AYERS (EXECUTIVE DI): $63,984 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Connecting refugees and new immigrants to the resources needed to establish roots, build community, and become selfsufficient.
What it reported doing in 2024
Client engagement: newcomer navigation provides personalized support to newcomers as they work toward meeting their immediate needs. Our team connects with each client to identify their goals, share resources, and create a plan of action, which may include being matched with a volunteer. Newcomer education provides in-person group services that develop skills, offer education, and build a sense of community. Our team works to remove barriers to access often experienced by clients, including transportation, language access, and childcare. Outreach: volunteer engagement equips and supports richmonders to be matched directly with newcomers, providing invaluable opportunities for both parties. These connections foster mutual respect and appreciation while helping our clients to navigate unfamiliar systems more easily. Newcomer networking celebrates and strengthens newcomer communities. From co-hosting the citys annual multicultural festival to collaborating with local ethnic based community organizations, we are committed to connecting people across diverse backgrounds and highlighting the richness of belonging in the richmond area. Community education empowers area residents to better understand and welcome newcomers by sharing insights on the resettlement experience, building capacity within community groups, and offering professional development opportunities like our annual refugee and immigrant volunteer summit (raivs). Fundraising: through campaigns, events, sponsorships, and individual donor stewardship, rer gains the resources they need to meet the mission. Administration: this includes the tools, technology, insurance and subscriptions we need to do the work. Items in this class are things that are not specific to one program but necessary to do business.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 69.4%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 69.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $520K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $64K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.