Razorback Band Alumni Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
710711580
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Little Rock, AR, USA
Phone
5016644435
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,038
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William Woolly (President and COO)

People named in this filing

  • William Woolly (President and COO)
  • David Woolly (VP)
  • Dr C Kighton Borad Member (Director of Bands)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Financial and in-kind service support of the Univ of Ark Band program. As requested by the Band Director. No services were needed or requested during 2025. We will no longer provide any direct service assistance after July 1, 2025. We closed our one bank account took all equipment of an electronic recycler listed in schedule N.

What it reported doing in 2025

Supported the Band Program by active participation in a fiscal campaign run by the University Band Office. Members of our association contributed and contacted former band members to ask for contributions to help pay the deposit required by the uniform company. All was deposited with university foundation, NOT with the Band Alumni Association.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -95.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.