Razorback Aquatic Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710648441
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Springdale, AR, USA
- Phone
- 4794444477
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $728,103
- Expenses
- $728,895
- Assets
- $100,954
- Liabilities
- $26,189
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TORI JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TORI JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN MOSELEY (DIR. OF OPER)
- AARON SCHAUB (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The name of the organization shall be the razorback aquatic club, inc. (referred to below as "rac"). Rac is a not-for-profit corporation, and is dedicated to the improvement, progress, and promotion of the sport of swimming. The purpose of this non-profit corporation is as follows: 1.to further the interest, awareness, and education in the sport of swimming. 2.to promote the development of swim skills, good sportsmanship, individual integrity, leadership, and a positive team atmosphere for all club swimmers. 3.to promote competitive swimming on the local, regional, and national levels. 4.to promote aquatic activities and safety as part of a healthy lifestyle.
What it reported doing in 2025
Services and accomplishments: we teach swim fundamentals, good sportsmanship and life skills needed for a lifetime of swimming enjoyment. Accomplishments for the year include more than 10 team hosted swim meets, multiple athletes placing in state level meets and several at national level meets. Our summer league touches over 500 students throughout the nw Arkansas area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 65
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.6%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.6% of revenue deployed · 97.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $713K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.