Raymond Coalition for Youth

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020713987
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Raymond, NH, USA
Phone
6038950600
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$349,899
Expenses
$402,373
Assets
$566,959
Liabilities
$5,844

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • PAT ARSENAULT (CHAIRMAN/TRE)
  • TIMOTHY CARTA JR (VICE CHAIR)
  • DUSTIN RAMEY (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To share ideas, plan activities and mobilize resources to promote positive youth development, family strenthening, and community building activities in raymond, nh.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing various programs and resources to promote positive healthy choices for youth, and to make raymond, nh a safe and drug-free community. Current year programs include: administration of comprehensive addiction and recovery act (cara) and New Hampshire bureau of drug & alcohol services grant awards to expand prevention and educational efforts among teens to prevent the use of illicit drugs and to promote treatment and recovery. Ongoing programs include: family fun night, connect: suicide, drug-free heroin task force, granite youth alliance, my choice diversion program, prevention summit, project safeguard, red ribbon drug prevention, sticker shock, summer series, vaping unveiled, youth action, youth food drive, rx take back. These programs include informational sessions for parents and the community at-large to learn about topics that are of concern to local youth. A youth worker position has been established to develop youth programs at the middle and high school level, and to support the many programs developed to reach out to the community. The programs work to promote positive, healthy behaviors for our youth. The organization has partnered with the local police department to create a diversion program whereby at-risk youth can avoid arrests and court and instead become educated about the dangers of alcohol and drugs. The organization benefits the entire community with its proactive outreach to youth, sponsoring numerous educational activities for local youth, and helping to keep kids safe during and after school hours. 1,000 college scholarship to local student active in our youth action programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.8%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 45.7%; rating input score 46
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.8% of revenue deployed · 45.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $184K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $117K reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.