Ray Liotta Scholarship Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 393327214
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Middlesex, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6099152547
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,050
- Expenses
- $11,408
- Assets
- $37,642
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- VINCE ORLANDO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VINCE ORLANDO (PRESIDENT)
- MARC GREENBERGER (TREASURER)
- KEVIN (HAYNES)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. Its primary purpose is to promote education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to deserving student-athletes pursuing collegiate-level golf at rutgers university.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization is dedicated to advancing educational opportunities for student-athletes by providing merit-based scholarships to individuals pursuing higher education. During the fiscal year, the organization awarded scholarships to two qualifying college-bound student-athletes who demonstrated academic achievement, athletic commitment, leadership qualities, and financial need in the amount of $5,000 per recipient. Through these efforts, the organization furthered its exempt purpose by reducing financial barriers to higher education, encouraging the integration of athletics and academics, and fostering the development of well-rounded student leaders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 6
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 2.9%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 12
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.3; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 2.9% of revenue deployed · 12.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.