Raw Spirit Festival Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208441065
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Prescott, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 9283082146
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,289
- Expenses
- $29,183
- Assets
- $16,537
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John D Van Hove (President)
People named in this filing
- Happy Oasis (Secretary)
- Micah Van Hove (Treasurer)
- John D Van Hove (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We comprise an expanding network of the worlds leading vibrant vegan, healthy living, eco-peace festivals and retreats for charitable, educational and inspirational purposes. The aim is to educate humanity on the health benefits of incorporating more fresh, organic fruits and vegetables into ones diet as well as other health-generating practices, including daily exercise, rest, fresh air, sunshine, yoga, meditation, ethics, caring for the environment, integrating eco-sustainable peace technologies and daily living practices, caring for each other, cultivating inner, family, community and world peace, organic gardening, orchards, raw vegan food preparation, expressing oneself creatively through uplifting art, music, dance, poetry, eco-inventions and sustainable commerce to catalyze the emergence of a raw-eco-peace economy. To accomplish this, we provide educational retreats and services.
What it reported doing in 2025
Total Grants
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 88% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.1%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 65.5%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.9%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.1% of revenue deployed · 65.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.