Raw Academic Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993467088
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Riviera Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5616186999
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,591
- Expenses
- $91,550
- Assets
- $19,041
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- O'Brian Edwards (Executive Director)
- India Edwards (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- O'Brian Edwards (Executive Director)
- India Edwards (Executive Director)
- Genesis Salmon (Youth Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Raw Academic Services is an education based organization program that offers equitable year-round academic support services to underrepresented populations and underserved communities. The mission is "Bringing equitable tutorial services to underserved communities by bridging academics and social/emotional learning to ensure our children have the necessary tools to prosper. RAW Academic Services "provides a holistic, year-round academic support and Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) development model for K-12 students and their families in high-need communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
2025 Spring/Fall YEC Contracts Successfully executed 20 week spring and winter tutorial cycles, bridging the gap between spring, summer, and fall quarterly seasons of the year. Approximately 70-80 students attended on a weekly basis. Spring 18% increase in passing ELA scores from PM2 to PM3 30% increase in passings Math scores from PM2 to PM3 100% Approval rating from parents and students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.