Ravenwood Mental Health Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
346573631
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chardon, OH, USA
Phone
4402852170
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,796,762
Expenses
$20,851,442
Assets
$5,179,136
Liabilities
$4,001,480

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MINDY HUGHES (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTINA PORT MPA (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • WILLIAM E GOLDMAN (DOCTOR): $245,769 total reported compensation
  • DR WILLIAM ROWANE (MEDICAL DOCT): $209,234 total reported compensation
  • DR JAMES ROBERT RODIO (MEDICAL DIRE): $199,969 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ravenwood mental health center exists to provide high quality, comprehensive, community-based behavioral health services to residents of geauga county and surrounding communities in order to maximize the autonomy, independence, and quality of life of recipients of our services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mental health outpatient program - ravenwood mental health center has developed a program of outpatient treatment services that includes several levels of care.the core of the program is built on ready access to outpatient mental health treatment services provided by licensed therapists and psychiatrists who provide general care for adults and chilren. Specialized services have been developed for child victims of sexual abuse and the supervised treatment of sexual offenders. Community support services are available to assist individuals with severe and persistent illness to maintain levels of functioning and community tenure. Intensive, in-the-community care is provided via ravenwood's assertive community treatment. A similar elevated level of care is available for families with multi-need chilren. Around the clock mental health emergency service is available by phone and fact-to-face with professional staff. Services are provided to geauga county residents without regard to ability to pay as a result of support of the geauga county board of mental health and recovery services and the united way services of geauga county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $253.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 80.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $16.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $246K · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.