Rauch Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351011521
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New Albany, IN, USA
- Phone
- 8129406608
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,557,109
- Expenses
- $12,361,421
- Assets
- $9,959,646
- Liabilities
- $2,007,652
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATELYN HINES (PRESIDENT)
- SHELLEY GAST (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DANIEL LOWE (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL LOWE (CEO): $234,391 total reported compensation
- ROSE BOOK (CFO): $105,191 total reported compensation
- DEANNA WOODS (COO OF RAUCH): $101,354 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support people with disablities through services designed to promote individual choices, growth, and wellbeing while encouraging an environment acknowledging value and contribution of all people.
What it reported doing in 2024
Industrial work services - provide assistance to clients in obtaining employment and consultation on their skills training. Through rauch industries, we offer work opportunities in integrated workplaces.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $220.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.9% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $234K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $660K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.