Raton Humane Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850271951
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Raton, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5754459328
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,708
- Expenses
- $94,210
- Assets
- $235,754
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARBARA J BONAHOOM (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA KLASSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BARBARA J BONAHOOM (PRESIDENT)
- DONNA KLASSEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- DIANNA B BEST (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Care of and prevention of cruelty to animals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Staffing & managment of a shelter for animals in the city of raton and the surrunding area. There are about 200 spay & neuters and 110 adoptions accomplished each year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 98.1%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $4,977.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.5%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.3% of revenue deployed · 98.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $92K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.