Rarity Bay Womens Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621768500
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Vonore, TN, USA
Phone
7174955939
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Women's Service Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,112
Expenses
$10,420
Assets
$34,325
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Amy Steward (President)

People named in this filing

  • Amy Steward (President)
  • Trish Dianetti (Treasurer)
  • Wendy Claus (Greeter Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide and promote an welcoming social environment, foster informational programs, enhance community relationships, and support charitable works.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Rarity Bay Women's Club served 390 women by holding bi-monthly birthday bash luncheons, social lunch bunch outings, learning labs, winter wonderland festival, several wine and dine events, fundraising bbq with live band event for first responders and activities with puzzles and games. The club served the community by holding several fundraising events to benefit the surrounding communities in need. Adopt-a-Class received monetary gift of $368.58 as well as supplies for the classrooms. Newborns in need received monetary gift of $875.00 and numerous supplies. Second Harvest Food Bank received monetary gifts of $3344.38 as well as numerous hours of voluntaring at the local food distribution stations. Local Children's Hospital received 50 decorated tiny trees as well as monetary gift of $100.00. First Responders received monetary gifts of $5109.15.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.29; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.