Randolph United Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882430083
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Coolidge, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5208693588
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $38,157
- Expenses
- $20,724
- Assets
- $126,853
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kyle Muldrow (President)
- Dion Rushing (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Kyle Muldrow (President)
- Dion Rushing (Vice President)
- Dorothy Wright (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Randolph United Council will continue to be the voice of the community of Randolph and seek the resources we need to take Randolph into the future, making it a thriving community once again. By seeking resources to help get infrastructure, fire and law enforcement protection, general clean-up efforts from residents and volunteers. Programs to treat health and mental health issues, drug addiction, homelessness, and unemployment, plus youth mentoring programs to help our youth pursue higher education. We will also seek grants and donations to build low-income housing to improve community social relationships and community engagement, as well as business networking opportunities. Randolph United Council believes that as an organization we can help eradicate years of negative impact and neglect to address our community needs, one resource at a time.
What it reported doing in 2025
Continued the multi-phase community development and safety initiative. In the 2025 fiscal year, the Council transitioned from land acquisition and initial safety improvements (fire hydrants and sidewalks) to active infrastructure development. Key accomplishments included the commencement of site-specific infrastructure construction and the execution of a comprehensive land-clearing and landscaping project. These efforts prepared the previously purchased community land for future development, ensuring a safe, clean environment and laying the groundwork for upcoming community-use facilities and essential services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.12; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -96.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.