Randolph Engine Company Number 5
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237166542
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Mount Freedom, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9738953719
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $90,341
- Expenses
- $82,523
- Assets
- $716,341
- Liabilities
- $185,520
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATTHEW GOEBEL (PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS NIEWIAROWSKI (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BERT BARTL (TREASURER)
- MATTHEW GOEBEL (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM SHORT (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This organization is a volunteer fire department which serves the local area
What it reported doing in 2020
Responded as needed for service in local area
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 96.6%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.7%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.68; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 96.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.