Ramsey County Historical Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 416009039
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6512220701
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies & Historic Preservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,115,821
- Expenses
- $1,565,061
- Assets
- $5,928,483
- Liabilities
- $136,037
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHAD ROBERTS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CHAD ROBERTS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $128,265 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preserving our past, informing our present, inspiring our future.
What it reported doing in 2024
Collections & exhibitions collections acquisitions: 57 individuals donated 890 books, 86.25 linear feet of archival materials, 534 photos, 42 artifacts to the rchs collections. A large collection of labor history books and archival materials were donated by the estate of david j. Riehle.mary livingston griggs & mary griggs burke research center: 1394 researchers were assisted in the research center. Photographs available online on the rchs website: 32,358.exhibitions: selma 70. The history of the civil rights movement and the stories of a group of 70 pilgrims from Minnesota who traveled from saint paul to selma, Alabama for the 50th anniversary of bloody sunday in march of 2015. In-person at the rchs gallery, landmark center, st. Paul mn from april 2025 through may 2026.march of the governors. Series of exhibit panels about each Minnesota governor, in conjunction with the podcast series. In-person at the rchs gallery, landmark center, st. Paul mn from july 1, 2024-march 2025.linked in friendship, connected in service: 50 years of the minneapolis/st. Paul (mn) chapter of the links, incorporated 1972-2022. (online with no end date anticipated.)persistence: continuing the struggle for suffrage and equality, 1848-2020. (online with no end date anticipated.)projects of note: collections go digital. On 12/6/2024, all cataloged collections (objects, books, photographs, archival collections) went online through the schneider geospatial beacon system. Previously, only photographs were offered online. These records are available free of charge for online searching. Https://rchs.com/collections/ additionally, the st. Paul building permit collection was also made available online after being acquired in 2003 and finally being fully digitized.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 73.1%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.2%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -40.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.79; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 73.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 26 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 27 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $101K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.