Ramapo Fed of St College Teach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237385664
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mahwah, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2016847108
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $344,321
- Expenses
- $329,999
- Assets
- $313,341
- Liabilities
- $1
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDWARD A SHANNON (President)
- NICOLE PEDOTO (Vice President)
- TIMOTHY JUDGE (Vice President)
- LYSANDRA PEREZ-STRUMOLC (Vice President)
- JESSICA STEINHEIMER (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- EDWARD A SHANNON (President): $14,780 total reported compensation
- ROARK ATKINSON (Secretary): $5,585 total reported compensation
- NICOLE PEDOTO (Vice President): $5,585 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides its members service as a bargaining agent.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 0 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $15K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.