Raise the Floor Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
208823323
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3127959115
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Legal Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,483,004
Expenses
$2,929,212
Assets
$555,760
Liabilities
$150,050

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARCOS CENICEROS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARCOS CENICEROS (PRESIDENT)
  • MIGUEL ALVELO-RIVERA (SECRETARY)
  • LAURA GARZA (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To ensure that low-wage workers have access to quality jobs and are empowered to uphold and improve workplace standards.

What it reported doing in 2024

Legal services: working hands legal clinic has transitioned into the raise the floor legal department. Legal services have played a critical role in bringing members to worker centers. These workers are developed into worker-leaders through skills trainings, educational programs about their rights, and participation in policy campaigns. Beyond litigation, raise the floor attorneys provide legal expertise which inform and advance policy development and campaigns. In addition, raise the floor legal undertakes strategic cases to test the gaps in current law and enforcement. In doing so, raise the floor legal works to develop strong case law and demonstrate the need for stronger, comprehensive policy solutions which are built into broader policy campaigns.research: successful policy advocacy requires strong research. The raise the floor investigates broad labor market trends affecting wages, work, and economic trends impacting low-wage industries. Raise the floor research builds off of community expertise by collecting data and tracking issues to demonstrate the need for policy changes.communications: the raise the floor communications helps position worker centers as the experts on low-wage worker issues. We do this by continually shaping the low-wage worker narrative and empowering low-wage workers to speak for themselves about the issues that most deeply impact their lives. Raise the floor communications develops strategies for building broad public support for policies that create permanent, full-time living wage jobs, and crafts appropriate messaging about workforce needs and solutions that can reach worker audiences and decision-makers alike.impact litigation: planning, preparing, and filing and defending law suits from low-wage workers that are focused on challenging the law. When there is a question or gray area about the law, our attorneys can identify an issue that affects a number of low-wage workers through impact litigation. One example to illustrate impact litigation is looking at the minimum wage ordinance, which only applies to employers that are located in chicago. However, there are cases where an employer is located outside of chicago, but has workers in chicago. Impact litigation allows our attorneys to see that the law isn't clear about who an employer is.identifying gaps: our attorneys identify gaps in the law by identifying weaknesses, inconsistencies and holes in the law where one assumes are covered but are not.informs policy: through impact litigation and identifying gaps in the law, this informs our policy work. If our attorneys identify a certain gap in the law, or if the courts are not upholding the law, or if the law isn't clear, we take that knowledge of the gap or misapplication of the law to pressure our legislators to change the law to benefit low-wage workers. Monitor: after there are amendments to the law, our attorneys can file a lawsuit to ensure that it is being upheld the way it should. Then the cycle continues.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.