Railway Independent Transit Union
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223763714
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Colonia, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9734847640
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $128,623
- Expenses
- $139,881
- Assets
- $395,467
- Liabilities
- $8,632
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAAM SOMWARU (GENERAL PRESIDENT)
- NICHOLAS J CALAMITO (LOCAL PRESIDENT)
- FRANCISCO MAZA (LOCAL PRESIDENT)
- GLEN MICEWICZ (LOCAL PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SHAAM SOMWARU (GENERAL PRESIDENT): $20,857 total reported compensation
- DANIEL LACEY (GENERAL CHAIRMAN): $4,245 total reported compensation
- FRANCISCO MAZA (LOCAL PRESIDENT): $4,186 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide member's benefits in the event of a strike.
What it reported doing in 2021
To provide support and financial aid to their members in the event of a strike. The organization also acts as an intermediary in regards to contract negiations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.83; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $140K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $21K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.