Rails to Trails Conservancy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521437006
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023319696
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,289,625
Expenses
$14,131,877
Assets
$23,044,292
Liabilities
$6,207,143

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RYAN CHAO (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RYAN CHAO (PRESIDENT): $365,031 total reported compensation
  • CYNTHIA DICKERSON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $253,884 total reported compensation
  • KEVIN MILLS (VP OF POLICY): $228,823 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The rails-to-trails conservancy is the nations largest trails org. With a grassroots community more than 1 mil. Strong dedicated to building a nation connected by trails, reimagining public spaces to create safe ways for everyone to walk, bike & be active outdoors.

What it reported doing in 2024

Trail development: since its inception, rtc has worked to reimagine public corridors and rights of way for people to walk, bike and be active outside creating vibrant public spaces that engage, inspire and empower communities from coast to coast. This work embodies best practices and leading-edge initiatives to guide trail development in ways that promote community engagement, bring innovation to trail development and planning, and prioritize trail networks and the connections that trails can deliver between people and places.through our trailnation portfolio of projects, rtcs creating national models that showcase the outsized benefits that connected trails and active transportation routes can deliver - locally, regionally and nationally. The portfolio is focused on nine places across the country that are diverse in their geography, culture, size, and scope - southeast Wisconsin, the san francisco bay area, the industrial heartland (western Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and New York state), greater philadelphia, Maryland, Washington, d.c., miami, northern New Jersey and new england. The lessons from trail nation are shared among rtc's trail nation collaborative, a nationwide peer learning community that brings together advocates, leaders, and professionals from across disciplines to establish and accelerate trail networks across america. The collaborative provides proven tools, methods, and resources, combined with rtc's expertise and network of partners across the country, to accelerate the development of connected trail systems. The great american rail trail is a flagship trail development project. It will be the nation's first cross-country multiuse trail, stretching more than 3,700 miles between Washington, d.c., and Washington state. This trail is an iconic piece of american infrastructure that will connect thousands of miles of rail-trails and other multiuse trails, serving tens of millions of people living along the route as well as those who visit the trail from around the country and the world. Rtc provides the national leadership and on the ground support - the work to organize people, plans, and ideas; trail planning and community engagement; and the advocacy and marketing to eventually complete the great american rail trail. Rtc continues to support trail builders nationwide in several ways, including managing an early warning system to notify stakeholders of upcoming railway abandonments; creating statewide trail inventories and development plans; providing technical assistance and grants for local trail development and management projects; and providing best practices training and education.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 74.9%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 95.9%; rating input score 96; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 74.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $10.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $365K · 28 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 42 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 35 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.