Radiating Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 275005906
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 9043276622
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $202,231
- Expenses
- $418,913
- Assets
- $45,491
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIRA SHAH (PRESIDENT)
- WAYNE JENKINS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS LADD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MIRA SHAH (PRESIDENT)
- WAYNE JENKINS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TOSH RYMER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide radiation equipment to countries where cancer care is hard to find and optimal treatments are sparse.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our mission is to provide and update radiation equipment to developing countries. Radiating hope is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded by radiation oncologists and mountain climbers wanting to help cancer patients around the world, our goal is to raise money to provide and update radiation equipment in countries where radiation therapy and cancer care is hard to find, and optimal treatments are sparse. We will create sustainable change as we educate communities, preserve cultural values, and build community relationships. We accomplish our mission in four ways: " one way is through our mountain climbing guide services. Climbers raise tax deductible pledges to purchase a climb package. The money raised is used to purchase and update radiation equipment for developing countries. Anyone who is interested, no matter their skill level, can raise money to climb with us. " we also raise money through selling tibetan prayer flags, which have long represented health, strength and hope. Cancer patients and their families can purchase a prayer flag in the patient's honor. Their initials are written on the flags, they receive a certificate, and can receive a framed prayer flag. A designated climbing team carries the flags on their expeditions, flying the flags at the peak. The flags' journey can be seen on our blog. " we seek partnerships with physicians, clinics, and radiation equipment manufacturers that have the resources to donate radiation equipment. " we partner with other non-profit organizations, including the international atomic energy agency (iaea) and asociacion latino americano de terapia radiante oncologia (alatro) in order to locate needs and fill the void. These agencies assist in overseeing that all donations are implemented, managed, money capitalized, and most importantly help maintain the radiation facilities for years to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 49% for direct work, and 51% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.9%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -107.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $418K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.