Rad Magpie
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830827440
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Burlington, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8025785324
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,440
- Expenses
- $8,884
- Assets
- $18,967
- Liabilities
- $160,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dana Steinhoff (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Dana Steinhoff (Executive Director)
- Megan McAvoy (Program Director)
- Margaret DeCapua (Communications Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rad magpie is a nonprofit game studio in burlington, vt who is doing its part to dismantle patriarchal white supremacy in the video game industry. We are changing the landscape of game development by providing support, access, and resources to those traditionally under-represented in the industry. By providing community and mentorship, we create a space for new voices; by championing new voices, we bring radical new stories to the world.
What it reported doing in 2023
Program services were dormant in 2023 due to winding up the organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.13; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.44; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -33.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -37.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.