Rachel Pregnancy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943165300
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Baker City, OR, USA
Phone
5415235357
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,723
Expenses
$65,436
Assets
$64,398

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Patricia Hoelscher (Chairman)
  • Jennifer Cikanek (Center Director)
  • Cathy Blankinship (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Rachel Pregnancy Center has been serving "teens in crisis pregnancies" since 1993. Our services also include helping anyone needing help with pregnancy related concerns and/or finding themselves in a difficult circumstance with their child(ren). Rachel Pregnancy Center is a Christian, non-profit, non-denominational, organization dedicated to meeting the material, emotional and spiritual needs of each individual. We offer services to anyone needing help with pregnancy related concerns or finding themselves in a difficult circumstance with their children.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provide support for expecting mothers who need aid physically or emotionally. Care is available to all ages and denomiations although a lot of our efforts it to expecting teen mothers as well as anyone needing help with pregnancy related concerns and/or finding themselves in a difficult circumstance with their child(ren). We do multiple events like the christmas tree present giving, baby bottle drive, and others to help support families in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -40.1%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.