Rachel Nesseth the Extra Mile Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923529875
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Zumbrota, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5079907578
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,169
- Expenses
- $6,401
- Assets
- $35,376
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BYRON NESSETH (President)
- LAURA NESSETH (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- BYRON NESSETH (President)
- LAURA NESSETH (Vice President)
- ALEC NESSETH (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of this Foundation is to continue to recognize and encourage excellence in Rachel's name. With generous support and encouragement of our wonderful community, we want to find, foster and fund the youth among us that are living a life of excellence and are going the extra mile for themselves and others. Just as Rachel had various interests, talents and pursuits, our Foundation will not limit those deserving of recognition. We welcome nomination of achievements large and small, academic, athletic, through music, volunteer work, faith and beyond. It is our goal to foster those qualities we so cherished in Rachel. Those are the qualities that will not only launch these individuals to success but will also bless the lives of those around them and point to Jesus. These are the youth that make our community, and the world, a place we all want to live.
What it reported doing in 2025
Promote education in rachel's name.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.3%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 66.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.53; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.3% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.