R&r Partners Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260703964
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7022280222
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $155,053
- Expenses
- $137,324
- Assets
- $38,979
- Liabilities
- $14,651
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FLETCHER V WHITWELL (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- FLETCHER V WHITWELL (PRESIDENT): $633,550 total reported compensation
- MORGAN BAUMGARTNER (ASSISTANT SECRETARY): $384,544 total reported compensation
- NICK VASSILIADIS (TRUSTEE): $193,080 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The r&r partners foundation is dedicated to transforming lives and strengthening the communities in which we live and do business. As a marketing communications firm, we provide our recipients with the public relations, advertising and government affairs assistance they need to develop a clear brand message for their organizations or cause.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide formatting and advertisement design and production services, cover the costs of running advertisements, and provide all other incidental costs associated therewith. The program services are accomplished by the donated services of r&r partners. An amount of $758,453 was received in donated services in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 93% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 51
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 49.5%; rating input score 49; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 64.3%; rating input score 64; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $634K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.