Queers with Careers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814651588
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Pearland, TX, USA
Phone
8324396609
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$96
Assets
$136
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dylan Forbis (Chief Executive Officer)

People named in this filing

  • Dylan Forbis (Chief Executive Officer)
  • Jacinda Valencia (Chief Operations Officer)
  • Dolores Napierkowski (Public Relations & Advocacy Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Career mentorship, community building, providing job opportunities, career fairs, education & resources.

What it reported doing in 2020

While focused on creating a network and presence for professionals, students, and community members seeking new skills, higher education preparation, and training's to improve their communities, Queers with Careers has helped increase confidence among community members to pursue their goals. Queers with Careers connects with community members in high school and college to provide mentorships and guidance on career aspirations and mapping and provided opportunities for scholarships and community service hours. The Chief Operations Officer developed infrastructure on how to outreach community and developed a sustainability plan for the organization. The Public Relations & Advocacy Director worked to provide guidance on how to outreach and engage the community. Queers with Careers created a network through mailing lists, YouTube presence, community events, and social media education. Our network currently consist of 526 active members, and 850 total members.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.