Queens County Conference
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364920222
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- West Islip, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9179355574
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fraternal Societies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,277
- Expenses
- $750
- Assets
- $10,336
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANTHONY CIVITANO (CHAIRMAN)
- ALBERT ROCCO (VICE CHAIRMAN)
- JOSE RUIZ (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The queens county conference is a centralize body for the exchange of ideas and visions amoung the various knights of columbus councils in the county of queens county, New York. The primary mission of the knights of columbus is charity and charitable works. The queens county conference serves two primary functions toward that end. The first is to host a "family fun charitable and benevolent day" during which donations are collected for the larger New York state of the knights of columbus. After expenses, the net proceeds are sent to the New York state council which are used for charitable donations to various charities. The second function is to endorsing a candidate for an officer's postion to the New York state council. None of the fund-raising activities is associated with this function, any expenses associated with this function is funded through the $30 annual dues paid by the councils in queens county to the queens county conference.
What it reported doing in 2025
Charitable and Benevolent Family Fun Day which raises funds for the NYS Knights of Columbus Charitable and Benevolent Program which donates to various Catholic and Secular Charities. All funds are donated to that program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 77% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 82.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.78; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.