Queen's Daughters Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
616087291
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Phone
5022288491
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,443
Expenses
$113,707
Assets
$171,459
Liabilities
$99

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LEIGH RAQUE (PRESIDENT)
  • PAULA SHEARER (FUNDRAISING VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DONNA KOENIG (MEMBERSHIP VICE PRESIDENT)
  • THERESA HENDRICKS (COMMUNICATIONS VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LEIGH RAQUE (PRESIDENT)
  • PAULA SHEARER (FUNDRAISING VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DONNA KOENIG (MEMBERSHIP VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide services and funds to catholic charities, other 501(c)3 organizations, and high school scholarships to needy girls and boys.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing opportunities for the members to further the organization's exempt purpose including monthly lunch meetings. In addition to the grants listed above the organization also provides donations to other non-profits in the louisville area based on need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $106K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.