Que the Music Performing Arts Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991614808
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Browns Summit, NC, USA
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Performing Arts Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,921
Expenses
$1,200
Assets
$721

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Tonya Wilson (Board Member)
  • Keya Hamilton (Board Member)
  • Sam Pass (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide affordable music lessons workshops and performance opportunities for students aged 8-18 from underserved communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program Service 1: Performing Arts Education and Training Que the Music Performing Arts Academy provides year-round music education and performance training for underprivileged youth in Greensboro NC. This program includes weekly vocal and instrumental instruction music theory classes and stage performance preparation. Number of Persons Benefited: 23 students annually ages 10 to 18. Accomplishments and Impact: Students participated in structured vocal training and public performances at events such as the Steven Tanger Center. Several students earned music scholarships to colleges including Howard University and Winston-Salem State University. One alum now performs professionally with Royal Caribbean. The program fosters confidence discipline and musical excellence in underserved youth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.5%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.