Quality Educator Interactive Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460971905
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Sun Prairie, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6085350304
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $33,109
- Expenses
- $24,272
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN FISCHER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- RON JETTY (PRESIDENT)
- JOE SCHROEDER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN FISCHER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- RON JETTY (PRESIDENT)
- JOE SCHROEDER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A) to develop and maintain a comprehensive, computer-based system for creating, storing, and sharing the professional development plans of educators who are licensed by the state of Wisconsin. B)to provide the state of Wisconsin with an efficient and cost-effective method for verifying the professional development plans of educators who are licensed in the state of Wisconsin. C)to provide a searchable data-base of research and other materials relevant to professional educators and interested members of the general public.
What it reported doing in 2018
Supported the state of Wisconsin's educator license renewal process by providing educators online access and support for professional development plans.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.5%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 175.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -27.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.5% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.