Quadw Missional Outreach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814590860
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Rawlins, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3073216047
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $763,645
- Expenses
- $727,957
- Assets
- $167,571
- Liabilities
- $8,719
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN MILLER (PRESIDENT)
- ADLENE KUFARIMAI (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DR DON WOOLLEY (NATIONAL DIRECTOR): $131,516 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization has two main goals: one is to help churches become less focused on themselves and more focused on their communities, and the other is to provide an internship opportunity for college students. The organization sends the interns to churches across the u.s. And abroad, and provides housing and stipends for the interns to live on site for the summer to help the churches.
What it reported doing in 2024
Quadw missional outreach places teams of young adults in under resourced communities to work alongside churches and nonprofits to help them reach and serve their neighbors. These teams may run summer kid's camps, work with those in poverty, marginalized populations, homeless persons, recovering addicts, and/or refugees and immigrants. Additionally, quadw missional outreach may host regional gatherings or national conferences focused on the needs of young adults and how to better equip and support them to serve others. During 2024, quadw missional outreach supported 42 interns serving in 5 sites across the united states and 1 site abroad. Additionally during 2024, the organization supported 19 residents at 1 site in the united states and 3 sites abroad.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.2%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -65.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.2% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $559K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.