Putnamnorthern Westchester Womens Resource Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133048837
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Mahopac, NY, USA
Phone
8456289284
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,463,739
Expenses
$2,378,948
Assets
$1,554,729
Liabilities
$434,601

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARYELLEN MARTIRANO (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • PIAGET SOLPIAGET (EXECUTIVE DI): $118,308 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Putnam/northern westchester women's resource center is a not for profit established to provide advocacy, education and services to the community in order to create a safe, supportive environment that eliminates violence against women, children and men and promotes gender equality.

What it reported doing in 2025

Residential domestic violence services: putnam/northern westchester womens resource center, inc. ("pnwwrc") operates a 15 bed newyork state licensed residential domestic violence shelter. The shelter provides 15 victims and their children emergency housing, support groups, life skills, advocacy, on-site case managment, adult/adolescent and children's counseling, crime victims' assistance, housing assistance, information and referrals, transportation assistance and recreation. The shelter is staffed 24 hours, 365 days a year. In 2025 the residential services provided 5,004 bed nights to victims of domestic violence and their children. 58 different individuals resided in the shelter during 2025. All 58 victims of violence were provided with the services listed above as needed or requested. Pnwwrc's putnam domestic violence rapid rehousing program provides between 6-25 rental assistance to victims of domestic violence who have fled or are attempting to flee the abuser. In 2025, 11 families consisting of 11 adults and 5 children were housed through this program. Putnam rental supplement program provides rental supplementation to any putnam county resident who is unable to sustain housing due to lack of income. The funds can be used for rental supplement of an apartment that is 85% of the area fair market rent.individuals contribute 30% of income to the costs and the program will pay the remainder to the landlord. In 2025, 5 homeless individuals were housed through this program and remain housed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $77.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $118K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.