Putnam County Community Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311159916
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Greencastle, IN, USA
Phone
7656534978
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,695,950
Expenses
$3,039,927
Assets
$56,469,559
Liabilities
$6,658,838

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KYLE BEASLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • STACEY HARTMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NEYSA MEYER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • NEYSA MEYER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $132,189 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The putnam county community foundation partners with those who give to enrich the quality of life and strengthen community for this and future generations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Pccf's mission is to connect people who care with causes that matter to improve the quality of life in putnam county, Indiana. Pccf fulfills this mission through grantmaking, scholarship administration, and philanthropic leadership.in 2025, pccf awarded grants to nonprofit organizations, schools, and community groups serving putnam county through competitive and donor-directed grant programs. These grants supported initiatives across a range of charitable fields including education, health and human services, youth development, arts and culture, recreation, community development, and nonprofit capacity building. Funding helped local organizations expand services, address emerging community needs, and strengthen programs that benefit residents throughout the county.pccf also administers numerous scholarship funds established by donors to support putnam county students pursuing postsecondary education. Scholarships are awarded based on criteria established by donors, including academic achievement, financial need, leadership, and community involvement. Pccf also administers the local selection process for the lilly endowment community scholarship, which provides a full-tuition scholarship and book stipend for four years of undergraduate study at an accredited Indiana college or university.in addition, pccf provides philanthropic services that help individuals, families, and organizations establish charitable funds that support the community over time. Through these funds and partnerships with donors, nonprofit organizations, and community leaders, pccf works to address local priorities and strengthen the long-term wellbeing of putnam county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.5%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 92.7%; rating input score 93; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.3%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.58; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.5% of revenue deployed · 80.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $132K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 50 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 47 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.