Pushing Boundaries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202043330
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Redmond, WA, USA
Phone
4258699506
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,370,637
Expenses
$944,680
Assets
$1,328,091
Liabilities
$478,259

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNIE LACROIX (PRESIDENT)
  • TERI MAYO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERI MAYO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $110,309 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide intensive exercise therapy that strengthens and supports people living with paralysis, and their families, to maximize health and improve quality of life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pushing boundaries is the northwest regional provider of intensive exercise-based recovery therapy and since opening in 2005 continues to provide services to clients from Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Hawaii, California, and Alaska. In an average, non-pandemic year, we provide an average of 5000 hours of hands on, intensive exercise therapy. Our services include comprehensive programs involving cutting-edge, high-tech equipment that includes manual and robotic gait training, electro-stimulated muscle activation and developmental neuro re-education and strength training. Pushing boundaries enables clients to increase independence and often regain use of paralyzed muscles. Outreach efforts to the medical community continue to benefit the paralyzed community with a high rate of physician and rehabilitation referrals, both in and out of Washington state, ongoing collaboration with facilities such as harborview, university of Washington, Virginia mason, providence, and other prominent facilities has strengthened our community outreach. Continued increase in volunteer opportunities has resulted in community collaborations and partnering with local businesses to provide a larger circle of care and more comprehensive involvement from the community through donation of time and services. In non-pandemic years, pushing boundaries offers internships and supports volunteers from schools of exercise science and nonprofit management from several prominent seattle area universities. In addition to providing services at an affordable cost, pushing boundaries partners with social services and successfully works with clients to obtain partial reimbursement costs for services rendered. However, the most significant accomplishments that we have made are the success stories of our clientele. With over two million dollars in community donations from thousands of individuals and foundations, client achievements have included the ability to return to work, resume driving, regaining arm strength to hug their children, increasing stamina to perform daily tasks, or gaining enough strength to become more independent during the day. The continued opportunity that pushing boundaries provides to our clientele is self-evident in the personal strides that each person continues to make in their road to increased health and improved quality of life.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.6%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 72%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.6% of revenue deployed · 72% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $680K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.