Purvis Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
522453815
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Portsmouth, VA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Group Homes

Reported finances

Revenue
$49,800
Expenses
$80,550
Assets
$120,257

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHANELL PURVIS (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • CHANELL PURVIS (CEO)
  • DESIREE PURVIS (DIRECTOR)
  • CRYSTAL PORTER (VOLUNTEER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We collaborate with the community to provide treatment interventions necessary to rebuild broken individuals. Our counselors provide tools and education to help bridge the gap between adults and youth. We teach needed and necessary coping skills along with effective communication techniques to assist with real life experiences. Upon completion of our program participants can become functional tax paying members of the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Life skills help young adults thrive while gaining tools to succeed in their relationships the workplace and at home. Mental health life skills include self-care emotional regulation and mindfulness practices. Relational skills include developing awareness around ones beliefs and behaviors fostering healthy and reciprocal relationships and learning how to listen and offer support. Practical life skills include things like changing the oil on a vehicle learning how to cook and organize and paying bills on time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -61.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -23.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.