Puresa Humanitarian Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900509285
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boca Raton, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5614799701
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,287
- Expenses
- $105,372
- Assets
- $778
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Giselle Meza (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Giselle Meza (President): $46,378 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to save lives, reach, rescue and restore children and women from the horrors of human trafficking and sexual servitude by creating a way out of slavery.
What it reported doing in 2024
For the year 2024 we are very happy to share that the programs which we support have been expanding, thriving, and many more women and children in need and devastation have been reached, empowered and helped. The safe homes, aftercare for girls, skills training centers for women, and education for girls is strong and successful as they fulfill their studies and training programs. Reaching their next steps toward their goals and aspirations.Our outreach and awareness educational programs are helping to reach, rescue, restore, and bring new life opportunity and independence to these innocent women and children, victims of human exploitation.Note: We worked hard mobilizing sending our support and efforts as a humanitarian organization to help those who we support to recover, rebuild, and have safety after the 2023 cyclone Remal a natural disaster which caused mass destruction. Our quick response helped them to continue moving forward in 2024 successfully within all their programs and projects which we support them in.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 44%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -35% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $46K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.