Purcell Municipal Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 730790960
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Purcell, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4055276524
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,513,649
- Expenses
- $14,072,340
- Assets
- $9,506,068
- Liabilities
- $3,944,156
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEM SCULLY (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KEM SCULLY (CEO): $155,017 total reported compensation
- TONJA SHANDY (PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT): $142,475 total reported compensation
- MARY A MORRIS (CFO): $76,804 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enrich the health and lives of those we serve through individualized, compassionate and exceptional care.
What it reported doing in 2020
The hospital is a 39-bed acute care hospital located in the city of purcell, Oklahoma. The hospital is leased from the city of purcell, Oklahoma to the purcell public works authority. The hospital was created under the laws of the state of Oklahoma and is exempt from income taxes under section 501(c)(3). The hospital provides short-term acute health and emergency care to the citizens of purcell, Oklahoma and surrounding communities regardless of ability to pay. We offer a medical clinic and specialty clinic to make access to specialists more convenient for the community. Eye surgery, pain management, scopes and general surgery are performed in our facility. Our facility can also fulfill the needs of swing beds and observation stays. The hospital provides health care services to patients who meet certain criteria under its charity care policy without charge or at amounts less than established rates. Since the hospital does not pursue collection of these amounts, they are not reported as patient service revenue.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 8 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.