Puerto Rico Community & Education Service Corps - Island Corps
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464544661
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Dorado, PR, USA
- Phone
- 2023501970
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $188,164
- Expenses
- $51,596
- Assets
- $122,231
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- MD Mayorga (Founder)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
IslandCorps is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to reimagining education and improving pediatric health and wellness for children and youth in Puerto Rico and the Caribbean. Through school adoptions, public health programs, nutrition initiatives, and volunteer-driven community engagement, IslandCorps works to break the cycle of poverty by empowering island communities with access to equitable, inspiring, and resilient learning environments. In 2024, IslandCorps mobilized hundreds of volunteers to rehabilitate public school classrooms, distributed over 9,700 toys to children in need, and launched its Eat Like an Islander pediatric nutrition initiative, delivering nutritious meals to summer camps in Vieques. The organization also hosted a Family Health Fair in Culebra, providing medical evaluations to children and elderly residents, and expanded its impact through strategic collaborations with the University of Miami, COREFI, and local artists and educators.
What it reported doing in 2024
Eat Like an Islander, Pediatric Nutrition Program
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 72.6%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.37; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 54.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 30% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 9 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.