Pueblo Spay & Neuter Now
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922075060
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Pueblo, CO, USA
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,550
- Expenses
- $1,550
- Assets
- $13,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
People named in this filing
- Samantha Albawab (Founder and Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission Statement: Pueblo Spay and Neuter Now is committed to supporting existing spay and neuter operations aiding pet parents in need and hosting pop-up and mobile clinics with the goal of making a lasting impact on pet overpopulation and homelessness.
What it reported doing in 2024
Educational Outreach: I create posts across multiple platforms including Facebook Nextdoor and Google which include the statistics for number of homeless animals entering American shelters annually and reminding folks that 4-5 million are still euthanized each and every year. Overpopulation compromises the quality of life and outcomes for these animals: They dont deserve to be struggling on the streets or being euthanized in shelters so lets fix them to fix those outcomes. Lots of people reach out to me for advice or help covering costs when they see my educational posts. People want to do the right thing but local clinics are booking out until September 2024 or charging $150 for a cat neuter with vaccines - Pueblo & most of Southern Colorado CANNOT afford this. Ive created references like the one linked below which I share with individuals across Southern Colorado. I connect pet parents to their nearest low-cost spay neuter resources and offer financial assistance to those wh
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 89.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.39; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 57.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 48% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.