Public Sector Solutions

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263589646
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4124975775
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,139,318
Expenses
$1,237,292
Assets
$565,241
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Public sector solutions for americas health care future ("ps2") is a resource aimed at assisting public/governmental entities with the analysis of health care costs and the development of strategic plans to address the uninsured and rising health care costs. Ps2's purpose is to assist in providing consistent medical care to the uninsured, as well as develop and test tools to support clinical effectiveness and cost savings for public/governmental health care entities.

What it reported doing in 2010

Florida projectsworking with various community leaders and public/governmental health care entities in the state of Florida to provide strategic assistance regarding increased health care costs, developing models to enhance clinical effectiveness and cost savings, and assistance with implementing a feasible plan derived by the analysis.expenses $ 132673. Including grants of $ 0. Revenue of $ 0.public awareness projectsraise public awareness of various health care issues through informational manuals/pamphlets/guides; event partnering; written op-ed's; conferences; speeches; and various social media outlets.expenses $ 127,991 including grants of $ 0. Revenue $ 0.community cardiac care programpartnered with New York presbyterian hospital to launch the community cardiac care program which aims to improve health and quality of life for heart failure patients in northern manhattan while reducing emergency room use and readmission rates.expenses $ 102536 including grants of $0. Revenue $ 0.achn quality improvement programpartnered with cook county ambulatory and community health network ("achn") to develop their quality improvement program.expenses $ 50000 including grants of $0. Revenue $ 0.chaldean initativecollaborate with the chaldean american ladies of charity on "project bisthuma", which helps provide low-income, uninsured adults with access to health care and prescription medications to the chaldean residents of the detroit metro-area.expenses $ 35164 including grants of $0. Revenue $ 0.HIV/adap programspartner with welvista on the AIDS drug assistance program (adap), which provides assistance and no-cost medication to patients who cannot afford HIV medication. Also, work with various agencies regarding HIV/AIDS related issues.expenses $34046 incluging grants of $ 0. Revenue $0.wv programsworking with various community leaders and public/governmental healthcare entities in the state of West Virginia to provide prescription medications to low-income, uninsured individuals.expenses $ 32448 including grants of $0. Revenue $0.hcraresearch and evaluate the impact of the health care reform act on various health care organizations, governmental agencies, and communities.expenses $ 32438 including grants of $ 0. Revenue $ 0.other program services: assistance to various health care organizations regarding implementation, program models, and evaluation of 340b drug pricing programs.strategic partnering with (and assistance to) various public/governmental health care entities in detroit, chicago, baltimore, and Florida.research, design, writing of e-books on various health care issues.expenses $ 82,174 including grants of $0. Revenue $0.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.