Public School Forum of Nc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581654064
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Raleigh, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9197816833
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,312,364
- Expenses
- $4,251,888
- Assets
- $7,274,386
- Liabilities
- $262,415
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARY ANN WOLF (PRESIDENT / EXECUTIVE DIRE)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY ANN WOLF (PRESIDENT / EXECUTIVE DIRE): $225,822 total reported compensation
- DEANNA TOWNSEND-SMITH (SR. DIRECTOR, DUDLEY FLOOD): $181,979 total reported compensation
- RHONDA VAN DIJK (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $122,896 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All North Carolina children shall have the opportunity to reach their full potential through equitable and meaningful public education that nourishes our state's civic and economic vitality.to provide trusted, nonpartisan, evidence-based research, policy analysis and innovative programs that empower an informed public to demand that education best practice becomes common practice throughout North Carolina.
What it reported doing in 2024
Other: to further research and development through other programs such as: education policy fellowship program (epfp)the forum has led the North Carolina education policy fellowship program (epfp) since 1992. North Carolina epfp is the only statewide program of its kind focused on leadership and professional development in the context of education policy. Each new cohort brings together a diverse and collaborative community of strategic leaders to promote equitable education policy. Fellows come from public schools, colleges and universities, state agencies, and a wide range of education organizations across North Carolina. Over the course of the program, epfp fellows dive deep into education policy issues on the local, state, and federal level, and are exposed to perspectives that they don't typically encounter in their daily work. Fellows increase their awareness of how public policy is made, learn who the key players are, and become more confident and involved in advocacy and the policymaking process. By the end of the year, fellows can expect to be more informed, well-rounded contributors to and leaders in the critical debates that shape education in nc and beyond. Epfp has graduated more than 1200 fellows and has a rich network of alumni in North Carolina and nationally who are working to shape education policy in different ways. Key research, policy analysis, and publicationsthe public school forum is a highly trusted source in North Carolina for research and analysis of key policy issues affecting public education. The forum's research and analysis helps to equip policymakers and education advocates with the knowledge and tools to advance policies that will lead to equitable educational opportunities and outcomes for all North Carolina children. For more than 30 years, the forum has annually produced the local school finance study, the only report of its kind in North Carolina that tracks counties' investment in public education. The report helps state-level policymakers understand the importance of adequate state funding for local public schools and the inequities in local funding across counties and helps county commissioners, district superintendents, and local school finance officers learn lessons from similar counties on how to boost resources for students. The forum's annual top education issues publication outlines the forum's policy priorities in advance of each legislative biennium and tracks progress towards those goals. The biennial roadmap of need presents county-level data on indicators of wellness across five domains: economic development, physical health, mental health and safety, education resources, and education outcomes. These domains capture the interconnected social, emotional, and academic elements that are necessary for a child to succeed, both inside and outside of the classroom. The roadmap serves as a key resource for afterschool providers, school and district administrators, nonprofits, community leaders, parents, and public education advocates to demonstrate the needs faced by local communities and inform efforts to create state and local policies that address them. The friday report is a weekly e-newsletter that reports on top education news, information, and events happening in North Carolina's schools. The friday report reaches individuals in the North Carolina department of public instruction and other state agencies, legislators and legislative staff, superintendents, teachers, education nonprofits, and the media, along with many other stakeholders in education. The forum also regularly publishes policy briefs, op-eds, and research reports exploring timely education policy matters. A recent example is a research report entitled "opportunity scholarships and the schools that receive them" which presents data on North Carolina's recently expanded school voucher program. Dudley flood center for educational equity and opportunity in october 2019, the forum formally announced the founding of
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.5%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.5% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 26 of 26 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $226K · 31 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.