Public Health Law Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411896367
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6512279171
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,014,213
Expenses
$6,099,029
Assets
$1,421,618
Liabilities
$877,012

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOELLE M LESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CAMILLE DAVIDSON (DIRECTOR): $249,747 total reported compensation
  • TRESSA CONSTANTINEAU RIES (SECRETARY & TREASURER): $245,771 total reported compensation
  • JOELLE M LESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $245,328 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We collaborate with others to reduce and eliminate commercial tobacco, promote healthy food, support physical activity, pursue climate justice, and address other causes of chronic disease.

What it reported doing in 2024

While our mission remains constant, our programs and activities evolve over time, as we take on a broadening spectrum of issues and strive to center equity more consistently in all our work. Despite the challenges of the covid pandemic, and notwithstanding our transition to a fully remote working environment, we continued to deliver effective services without interruption. Among our program service accomplishments during the year:1. We continued as the nation's primary source of legal technical assistance to those addressing the leading cause of preventable death: the epidemic of commercial tobacco use. Among other things, we:-provided legal technical assistance and education to public health professionals and advocates in tribes, territories, states and municipalities around the country.- completed our sixth year of service as the designated legal policy experts supporting the state of California's commercial tobacco control program, earning top marks from the state's evaluators and overwhelmingly positive feedback from grantees. - completed our fourth year as the designated legal center supporting the New York state's commercial tobacco control program.- monitored and demystified the food and drug administration's regulatory regime for tobacco products, pressing for greater transparency and accountability.- answered hundreds of requests for technical assistance from every state of the nation on dozens of issues, ranging from implementation of smoke-free policies to the regulation of electronic cigarettes. The information, resources, and guidance we provided to community leaders supported the development of dozens of innovative new policies. - expanded our digital library of over 500 tobacco-related policy resources. These resources were distributed through our website, which was visited by over 500,000 users, and through a monthly electronic newsletter sent to more than 7,000 public health professionals across the country.- trained thousands of professionals through delivery of sixty webinars and other presentations.2. We continued to help community coalitions, health advocates and others pursue effective policies to support healthy eating and encourage physical activity. Our food-related work addressed dozens of policy options ranging from improved nutrition standards for government facilities, to development of farmers' markets, to taxation of sugary beverages. We also continued to support policies that encourage active lives, including legal issues involved in developing pedestrian-friendly roadways, laws affecting biking and walking, and policies related to community design and development. 3. We completed our fourth year of a new climate health policy program. Work included engaging with the u.s. Housing and urban development agency to around improving indoor air quality public housing to better protect health. This initiative included resident engagement to ensure that the policy priority reflected resident priorities for clean air in housing. In addition, we have a legal technical assistance program supporting municipalities working to advance policies that decarbonize buildings.4. We completed our first year of our newest program area with funding from the u.s. Centers for disease control and prevention to build public health law capacity in state, tribal, local and territorial health departments. The project also supports information sharing among jurisdictions through data use agreements.5. We continued to develop a growing body of work addressing the unique legal issues and health challenges of policymaking within sovereign tribal nations, where centuries of genocide and multi-generational trauma have created extreme chronic disease inequities, but where a focus on traditional ways and culture provides a foundation for creative approaches that reinforce community resilience. Our work ranges from cross-cutting training on the policymaking process, to policies that support traditional foodways, to policies that prot

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.2%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $250K · 8 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $201K reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.