Public Education Foundation of Evansville Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351660363
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Evansville, IN, USA
Phone
8124221699
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$385,242
Expenses
$426,412
Assets
$1,157,263
Liabilities
$25,665

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW OZETE (PRESIDENT/DI)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATE REIBEL (EXECUTIVE DI): $45,577 total reported compensation
  • AMY WALKER (EXECUTIVE DI): $21,220 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support the public education student body: fund projects and programs which engage the community and reward student centered innovation in the public schools.

What it reported doing in 2018

Scholarships were awarded to 21 university students. Teacher study grants have been awarded fro professional development opportunities. Once completed the individuals will share the information with others throughout the evansville vanderburgh school corporation. Academic superbowl-teams of students from all 15 evansville vanderburgh school corporation, middle and high schools, are supported by the foundation so they may compete annually in areas of fine arts, math, language arts, science and social studies at the city, regional, and state level. Children's theatre productions provide weeklong after-school programs for up to seventy-five elementary and middle school students. They participate in original musica adaptations of a children's fairy tale. Students audition, rehearse with cast and crew and provide two performance on saturday. Academic team assistance-financial assistance is provided for student academic teams who qualify at the state and/or national level in competitions. Middle school speech-each fall this program provides students from all ten evsc middle schools the opportunity to compete in various areas of speech. These areas includ poetry, prose, interpretation, original oratory, and duo interpretation unscripted. Sustainability grants to suppor projects which increase classroom learning in the fields of energy conservation and environmental stewardship. Priority is given to projects that demonstrate the ability to sustain themselves beyond a single school year. Career exploration day-schools participate in the event with middle and high school students from evansville and the surrounding counties participating. Participants have the opportunity to learn from local corporations and businesses about the products and services they provide, the career options they offer, and how they are making a difference in the tri-state area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.2%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.71; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.2% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $328K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $46K · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.