Public Children Services Association of Ohio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 310996612
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Columbus, OH, United States
- Phone
- 614-224-5802
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,861,716
- Expenses
- $4,854,343
- Assets
- $7,478,252
- Liabilities
- $2,515,846
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACY COX (PAST PRESIDENT)
- AMY FRAME (PRESIDENT)
- JULIE GILBERT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA SAUSSER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA SAUSSER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $210,274 total reported compensation
- FAWN GADEL (OHIO START DIRECTOR): $155,583 total reported compensation
- ERIC S BRITTON (ASSISTANT DIRECTOR): $151,283 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PCSAO is a membership-driven association of Ohio’s county Public Children Services Agencies that advocates for sound public policy, promotes program excellence, and builds public value for safe children, stable families, and supportive communities. Dan Schneider, former director of the Knox County Department of Human Services, was hired as the Association’s first full-time executive director. With staff in place, the Association expanded its efforts to support counties and advocate for children and families in the public policy arena, including: financial management and media manuals, workload studies, new county executives orientation, levy campaign consultation, and a variety of training, consultation, and technical assistance offerings to assist policy implementation in the counties. 1990 Crystal Ward Allen, then a graduate student on field placement with PCSAO, researched and...
What it reported doing in 2025
Ohio start (sobriety, treatment, and reducing trauma)/costars - a specialized child welfare service delivery model that improves outcomes for children and families affected by parental substance use and child maltreatment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.7% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $210K · 22 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $574K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.