Public Art Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 132898805
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2122237800
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,645,098
- Expenses
- $6,732,745
- Assets
- $9,660,343
- Liabilities
- $1,603,429
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN K FREEDMAN (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW R BROWNSTEIN ESQ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- HOLLY LIPTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NICHOLAS BAUME (ARTISTIC & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- NICHOLAS BAUME (ARTISTIC & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $444,140 total reported compensation
- SUSAN K FREEDMAN (PRESIDENT): $371,428 total reported compensation
- STEPHANIE ADAMS (DEPUTY DIRECTOR - EXTERNAL AFFAIRS): $252,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As the leader in its field, public art fund brings dynamic contemporary art to a broad audience in New York city and beyond by mounting ambitious free exhibitions of international scope and impact that offer the public powerful experiences with art and the urban environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Exhibition programpublic art fund (paf) engages artists of different backgrounds whose works reflect different points of view and the diversity of New York city. Paf's major initiatives include dynamic exhibitions, installations, and new commissions of artwork by an international roster of artists at all points in their careers from emerging to globally recognized. These projects bring important works of art outside the traditional confines of museums and galleries, directly to places where new yorkers live and work-including parks, plazas, outdoor advertising venues, and other unexpected sites-where they can be experienced free of charge. (see schedule o)each year, paf works with artists to create site-responsive works for varied locations throughout New York city, and to debut existing sculptures and installations. Commissioning new works involves developing long-term relationships between paf and individual artists; it can take from a few months to several years to develop a project and address the complex technical and logistical considerations involved in presenting new works in the public realm.paf maintains a collaborative approach to developing projects, wherein individual artists respond to a site in New York city. As a result, paf's installations are closely integrated into their locations and offer opportunities to see these sites in new ways. To meet the organization's goal of reaching the broadest possible audience, projects are located both in highly trafficked locations and spread across New York city's five boroughs. Education and outreach programspaf's outreach programs expand upon its exhibition activities by making them accessible to a wider audience. Paf produces didactic materials in print and digital formats to support each of its projects, and to aid audiences in enjoying and understanding public art projects by contemporary artists. Paf's audience is as broad and diverse as the make-up of New York city's residents and visitors, and it is estimated that some 11 million people experienced a paf exhibition or program in the last year.given the unique challenges of mounting an exhibition outdoors, paf also devotes significant resources to engaging with its online audience through both its website and social media platforms. Publicartfund.org features extended information on each exhibition and artist, as well as maps and general information about the shows. Videos for each exhibition illuminate the artists' thought processes and offer opportunities for online viewers to experience the shows from the perspective of an in-person visitor. Public art fund continues to present its signature lecture series, public art fund talks, virtually and in person. Organized in collaboration with the cooper union, they connect compelling contemporary artists to a broad public by establishing a dialogue about artistic practices and public art.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.5%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 96.4%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.5% of revenue deployed · 58.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 27 of 28 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $444K · 31 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $469K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.