Public Accountants Society of Colorado
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 846042160
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7194717366
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,345
- Expenses
- $27,784
- Assets
- $6,128
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kinna McDavid (Vice President)
- Jeanine Buben-Croy (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Jerry W Laird (Treasurer)
- Kinna McDavid (Vice President)
- Jeanine Buben-Croy (President & CEO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Public Accountants Society of colorado is a nonprofit membership organization founded in 1948 that provides tax and accounting seminars in areas such as Corporations, Partnerships & LLC's, 1040 Individual Income Tax Updates, and specialty topics, such as Medicare, Social Security, Fiduciary 1041, and Federal Estate Forms 706 and 709. We also provide public policy education, professional networking opportunities, and other services to members and non-members. PASC serves pulic accountants including tax preparers, Certified public accountants, accounting educators and students, enrolled agents, certified financial planners, accredited tax preparers and advisers, RTRPs, and other financial profesisonals.
What it reported doing in 2025
Education seminars and conferences held throughout Colorado to educate members and non-members in the tax code, general accounting and ethics. Organization maintains a website and publishes newsletters to desseminate information on tax laws, upcoming events and member news.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -60.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.