Pta Tn Congress - Walnut Grove Pta
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621430432
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Franklin, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6154724870
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,948
- Expenses
- $58,272
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNIE HARALSON (CO-PRESIDENT)
- AMY CHILDS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- ANN MINNIUM (CO-PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- LAURA ROSE (CO-PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- JORDAN BEAIRD (PAST-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANNIE HARALSON (CO-PRESIDENT)
- AMY CHILDS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- ANN MINNIUM (CO-PRESIDENT-ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to promote a) the welfare of children and youth in home, school, community, and place of worship b) to raise the standards of home life c) to secure adequate laws for the care and protection of children and youth d)to bring into closer relation the home and the school, that parents and teachers may cooperate intelligently in the education of children and youth. E) to develop between educators and the general public such united efforts as will secure for all children and youth the highest advantages in physical, mental, social, and spiritual education. The association's purposes are promoted through an advocacy and educational program directed toward parents, teachers and the general public.
What it reported doing in 2020
In addition to achieving the association's purpose, the association wanted to improve teacher morale and enhance technology in the classroom. The association purchased items for teachers, including, but not limited to, i-pads, new computers, new desks & chairs, security cameras and safety technology.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2011 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.