PTA Texas Congress - Pecan Grove Elementary PTA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760265674
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Richmond, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2816344800
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,632
- Expenses
- $50,724
- Assets
- $14,857
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHERYL GRIMES (President)
- BRITTANY FRANCIS (Vice President-Programs)
- SHONDA RUSSEY (Vice President-Membership)
People named in this filing
- CHERYL GRIMES (President)
- BRIANNA MARVIN (Treasurer)
- ROBIN STIRMAN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Child Advocacy and Enrichment
What it reported doing in 2016
To provide teacher support and enrichment materials for their classroom and students by funding: technology software upgrades, library improvements, guided reading materials, teacher appreciation, and a variety of learning materials for approximately 40 faculty members in our school.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 69.3%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 69.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.