Pta Texas Congress

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
756062101
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,979
Expenses
$59,614
Assets
$46,781

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leia Cirila Villa (President)
  • Kaylee Decker (1st Vice President)
  • Mandy Mitchell (2nd Vice President Hospitality)
  • Heather Sharp (3rd Vice President Membership)
  • Emily Herrig (4th Vice President Programs)
  • Meghan Kelley (5th Vice President Fundraising)

People named in this filing

  • Leia Cirila Villa (President)
  • Kaylee Decker (1st Vice President)
  • Mandy Mitchell (2nd Vice President Hospitality)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Martha Turner Reilly PTA is to positively impact the children families staff and neighbors that are a part of the Reilly Community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Organized and produced parent and community engagement activities throughout the school year including but not limited to Donuts with Grown-Ups STEM curriculum night spring musical - Disneys Moana Jr. and art show. Benefitted 600 students 75 teachers and staff 1500 community members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 71% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.9%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.9% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 8 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.