Pta Texas Congress

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 743004022
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2010–2025
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location: Round Rock, TX, USA
Phone: 0000000000
Rating: 46
Verdict: MIXED
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $42,538
Expenses: $35,483
Assets: $45,693
Liabilities: $8

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Elizabeth Moczygemba (President)
Phung Luong (Vice President)
Vanessa Martin (Vice President of Membership)

People named in this filing

Elizabeth Moczygemba (President)
Phung Luong (Vice President)
Charmaine Terania-Young (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The non-profit Cactus Ranch Elementary School PTAs purpose is to make every childs potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children

What it reported doing in 2025

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 0
Transparency & Controls: 100
Sustainability: 58
Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.