Pta Texas Congress

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742611635
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,254
Expenses
$112,973
Assets
$104,157
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Virginia Hoelscher (President)
  • Brandon Kraft (1st Vice President)
  • Ashley Aarons (2nd Vice President)
  • Andrea Lathrop (3rd Vice President)
  • Elizabeth Andrews (4th Vice President)
  • Albert Saenz (5th Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Virginia Hoelscher (President)
  • Heather Pate (Treasurer)
  • Brandon Kraft (1st Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Kealing Middle School PTA has 6 objectives 1 promote the welfare of children and youth in home school places of worship and throughout the community 2 to raise the standards of home life 3 to advocate for laws that further the education physical and mental health welfare and safety of children and youth 4 to promote the collaboration and engagement of families and educations in the educations of children and youth 5 to engage the public in united efforts to secure the physical mental emotional spiritual and social well being of all children and youth and 6 to advocate for fiscal responsibility regarding public tax dollars in public education funding

What it reported doing in 2025

0

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -53.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.